User talk:Greatgallsoffire

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!DXRAW 21:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I didnt know. Please kindly leave my signatures alone. Greatgallsoffire 21:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DXRAW 22:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well you seem to be the one doing all the personal attacking.Greatgallsoffire 22:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

07:55, 23 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Gary Glitter (rv vandalism I signed you plonker)

DXRAW 22:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:TALK I was within my rights.

Unsigned comments: You are allowed to append {{unsigned}} or one of its variants to the end of someone's comment if they have failed to sign it. The form is {{subst:unsigned|USER NAME OR IP}}, which results in —The preceding unsigned comment was added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs)

DXRAW 23:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It says dont tamper with other peoples copmments. Given you were doing it to humiliate me I think you are out of line Greatgallsoffire 23:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain i was meant to humiliate you by following Wikipedia policy? DXRAW 23:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on March 23 2007 to Gary Glitter

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Nishkid 64 00:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this warning is coming in response to a 3RR violation report submitted DXRAW here. I decided to not block you, since you were a relatively new user and you may not be familiar with Wikipedia policies. Nishkid 64 00:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome, SqueakBox 19:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DXRAW 22:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont worry this editor cant block you and he's unlikely to find another one whoi will given this is a POV dispute, SqueakBox 23:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that you cannot be blocked for an alleged NPOV violation , this user is making it up and his assertiion is not backed by any policy, SqueakBox 16:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This dxraw user is being so unpleasant I dont think I want to have anything to do with wikipedia any more. Classic internet troll (and that is being polite).Greatgallsoffire 17:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well thatr would be a shame. For reasons I dont understand (except maybe just fan bases) some users hate including of child porn issues for pop stars, eg see Pete Townshend, SqueakBox 18:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never did like The Who whereas I used to go and watch GG. Great showman gone wrong.Greatgallsoffire 18:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet allegations

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SqueakBox is a claim that you are a sockpuppet of mine. Clearly not the case but i thought I would let you know anyuway, SqueakBox 18:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The case has now been resolved with check user finding our accounts unrelated. Hope you keep editing here but do try to not just edit war (ie revert other users) as edit warring is harmful to wikipedia, SqueakBox 22:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wierd!Greatgallsoffire 18:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]