User talk:GreenZmiy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome to Wikipedia from Cygnis insignis[edit]

Hi, GreenZmiy. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! cygnis insignis 08:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

interwiki on Ajugoideae[edit]

Was there a reason for this edit which deleted three interwiki links from Ajugoideae? I didn't see anything wrong with the links, so I put them back, but it is possible I was missing something. Kingdon (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Because in English section it is described subtribus, and Russian and others - subfamily. --GreenZmiy (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I wouldn't take the tribe thing very seriously. We only have one reference, dated 1845, for tribe (not subtribe), and the classification of the Lamiaceae has been changed, in some areas significantly, in 1992 and perhaps since then based on DNA evidence. I'm not sure what was going on with the 1845 work, but -oideae is the standard ending for a subfamily not a tribe (see Taxonomic rank#Terminations of names). More interesting to me than a few interwiki links, though, is whether this article even makes any sense in light of current (re)classifications (or even in light on historical classifications, if our intention is to treat the history). I've put in a query at WT:PLANTS#Lamiaceae subfamilies. Kingdon (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, GreenZmiy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]