User talk:Grim Reaper66

Welcome

Hello, Grim Reaper66, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Army of Freshmen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Army of Freshmen is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Army of Freshmen saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. RJASE1 20:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Army Of Freshmen Page

The page was speedily deleted because it was a repost of an article that had been deleted as a result of an AfD discussion (the original discussion can be found here). To request a reconsideration for article inclusion, you should request a deletion review. The primary justification for the original deletion seems to have been that the band did not meet notability criteria in WP:MUSIC, so I would read that section and justify notability based on one or more of those criteria. Best of luck, and hit me with any questions you may have... RJASE1 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Trivium page

If you have citation for the rising please relist and give the citation. However, I can't find any citation. Therefore should not be listed. Moreover, Rain was never released as a single... it just had a video recorded as a promotional thing, I read it somewhere reliable once! I am not saying this is vandalism, because I am sure there was not any intent to vandalise, but please make sure there is citation for things you list. Asics talk 18:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Trivium (band)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Grim Reaper66! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule blog\.myspace\.com/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding an edit to Slipknot (band)

You removed brackets from a quote in the Slipknot article. I assume you did this because you thought they were a typo or vandalism. They were neither. The brackets represent where a quote was a reworded so that it may be better understood by a reader. --Wildnox (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kaiser Chiefs discography

Hello. I have removed the chart positions you added because the sources don't support them. They can and should be added back into the article when reliable sources to can be found. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Fall Out Boy

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Fall Out Boy/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Closer (Lacuna Coil song)

The article Closer (Lacuna Coil song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of WP:N, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Palahniuk's Laughter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palahniuk's Laughter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palahniuk's Laughter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]