User talk:GroundhogTheater

Welcome...

Hello, GroundhogTheater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Gman124^talk 17:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL[edit]

Noticed you were trying to add that Rex Ryan was hired but per WP:CRYSTAL, we can't add that until someone like ESPN says he has accepted the deal not will accept. Please wait until it happens.--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 14:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Route 382[edit]

I was very surprised to see an article that I am editing on the AFD list!

The point you bring up is worthy of discussion. What should Wikipedia become? There are many obscure articles in Wikipedia. Over time, a certain standard has been followed regarding what articles are to be kept in Wikipedia and what ones are destroyed (deleted).

Would you like to re-formulate or define the criteria more specifically? I am willing to work with you to develop standards. As you can see, Wikipedia articles include Equitrac, Electronic Distributed Monitoring and Evaluation Solution, Hard turning, Argyrocupha, Frostenden, etc. Chergles (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at your nomination for about ten seconds and I SEE TEXT IN ALL CAPS LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING and WP:PRETTY and stuff like that. That the way to treat someone's FAC which you are sending to AFD? --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just defending my buddy. YOU made it personal! --BurpTheBaby (Talk) 23:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giving the required notification that you have been reported to WP:WQA. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ground. While you may have a dispute with others, I don't have a personality dispute with you. Should we discuss what we want Wikipedia to be? My guess is that you think the NY 382 article is too obscure. I hear what you appear to be saying. Should we try to change Wikipedia? I'm willing to consider it. Currently, Wikipedia is a popular encyclopedia and a social site, not an exclusively scholarly encyclopedia. Should we make it so? Chergles (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPI case[edit]

See the results posted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GroundhogTheater. I'm posting this to the talk pages of all 5 accounts. You can communicate with me by email if you like. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]