User talk:Gtown05
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/70.143.68.157 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 23:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. B 05:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Reply.
[edit]Regardless of being factual or unbiased, the fact is nothing more then a trivia item. Do not proceed to warn me of edit warring, I merely caught the addition on New User Changes. Furthermore, do not claim Vandalism in a content dispute. SpigotMap 05:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SpigotMap 05:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
Unblock
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Gtown05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This case is a joke. I have done nothing wrong. My edits were repeatedly vandalised by user jmfangio. I posted completely factual, non-biased, highly relevant information on numerous pages that he continued to vandalise and revert-delete. He repeatedly violated wikipedia policy that requires users to improve on others changes rather than make reverts. This guy is clearly completely biased and doesn't want any of these highly publicized statements to make it onto wikipedia. He is a member of the wikipedia NFL project and he created the article on "Vick achievments." The bottom line is the statements by these athletes that I posted are completely factual and include no opinion. They violate no wiki policies. They are highly relevent and generated lots of news coverage. Wiki posts controversial statemetns by lots of people, be it politicians like President Bush or athletes like Keith Hernandez (see his comments on women and baseball). These statements by these athletes on dogfighting got more media coverage than keith hernandez's comments and jmfangio is waging an organized revert war campaign to keep the information completely out of the wiki record. This is preposterous someone needs to stop this abuse.
Decline reason:
It is highly probable that you were using multiple accounts and IPs to circumvent the 3RR rule. — -- lucasbfr talk 22:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.