User talk:Guy Harris/Archives/2017/05

Please Stop!

As to the problem (rather than question) whether x86-64 is the 64-bit version of x86, I have asked this question on both Intel and AMD corporations, they do not give the same result. As refer to the latest AMD and Intel Official documents, there is nothing saying confirmation your presumption. They both differentiate them both, rather than count it as some a version in your vocabulary. So please stop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.9.21.45 (talk) 01:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

A programmer for programming kernel-level for more than 40 years!

Wow, wow, wow! I just wish you do not set word traps on Wikipedia.org anymore, do not contribute those misleading contents anymore! Jeh, has a stupid training company to train others to be computer expert! But I just wonder trained by such a misleader, who could be the real computer expert? Yeah, he or she might be computer genius, because they could fabricate a 64-bit version of x86 architecture, and admit everything which Intel, AMD, Microsoft and so many other companies would never admit! I know those people are very great, because they almost manipulate the entire It world virtually in their smart brains. Oh, they would never be act like pigs, because they would differentiate pigs from human being. Many thanks for all those fairies makers, one could also find some pleasure in this very hollow world... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.9.15.78 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 18 May 2017 UTC (UTC)

Maybe you are too old!

One question embraced with me all the time, why you always want to fabricate something, criticise others, estimate others rather than correct all the mistakes you made on Wikipedia.org? If a programmer, programmed for more than 40 years, he or she won't have so much energies on Wikipedia.org to write so many childish things and accused others as Dunning-Kruger effect. The only reason is that you are just another liar! So you are just another liar! Fooling around the world, fooling around the innocent readers from all over the world.

I have never the ideas what you intentionally put on me, I just correct what I like, and that is my favour. I got in touch with AMD64 processors since early 2005, and read articles since late 2004. You and your guys are ruining those articles with your poor reaches. Have you read any book on computer architecture? If not, please read some, and stop make that ridiculous analogues.

"x86 is a family of backward-compatible instruction set architectures..."

This is the most ridiculous definition that I found all over the world! This thing would tell the world that you are just a little babe in the woods, not only that you are not a programmer with experiences for more than 40 years, but also you are not someone should work in the IT field. You just fool yourself and others all the time! Can this stupid definition stops people finding amusement on Wikipedia.org, but the author just tell the world he or she is just a silly what definitely!

You have told the world you are not that sure about those things you made on Wikipedia.org, and lots of strong negative voices would make you could not fall to sleep as usual for days! So it might be the time for you to face with your real self, rather than fabricating all the time! I know the name of Jeh, and I would also your actual and real name too, in not far future...I wish you both stop making lies any more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.53.108.167 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 18 May 2017 UTC (UTC)

Oh gosh, Janagewen. You've been "reading articles". Yeah.

You're the "Randy In Boise" of x86. Have fun with your skeletons! Jeh (talk) 04:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Oh, Jeh, sorry, I forgot your name, maybe that is also a fabricated name and company, but you are a misleader as I always said. Wish you both have a deserved journey on the fabrications, continue fabricating as you like... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.53.109.106 (talk) 05:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

You're right - he doesn't exist, his company doesn't exist, I don't exist, the innocent readers from all over the world don't exist, only you exist. Guy Harris (talk) 06:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Gosh. The phrase "backward-compatible instruction set architectures" first appeared in this edit, by the user with the IP address 83.253.243.39. No, that's not me - the edit summary isn't my style. (But that won't stop you from making up some fantasy that it's me.) "Family of instruction set architectures" first appeared in this edit, by 83.255.35.120, who is also not me. So it's not as if I had anything to do with "family of backward-compatible instruction set architectures", other than thinking it's a reaspmable description - just as everybody else who reverted your non-improvement does.

(BTW, a reasonable person might either ask themselves why they managed to get himself or herself banned for an indefinite period from multiple language editions of the Wikipedia or would not have gotten banned in the first place. Either there's a huge conspiracy against you, or you have a strong penchant for antisocial behavior. If I were you, I'd take the second of those possibilities very seriously - you're not exactly impressing people with your behavior, given how often you've gotten banned, blocked, etc.. But you're probably so invested in your self-image that you won't take it seriously; I'd suggest you seek therapy.

Oh, and "С новым годом" is how you say "Happy new year" here, Господин Сумасшедший.) Guy Harris (talk) 07:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of me, yeah, I am not an impressing person all the time, maybe you mistake me to. Read your words make me feel comfortable. If you think my edits on the x86 is meaningless, ok, just forget it...All is up to you...I've read your words, tired, very tired. I also leave another topic on the talk page of x86-64. Computer genius, 40+ years, please take a look at it when you come back... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.9.20.9 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC (UTC)

Please take a look at ...

Please take a look at here. Years ago, I promised to improve the big table in wiki article x86, and for days, I contributed my time on it. Please take a look at that, any suggestion is preferred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.9.23.111 (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)