User talk:Gwpwiki
Global Water Partnership
[edit]Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) says that an organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. No matter how notable the members of an organization are, they do not provide notability. Please find independent sources for the Global Water Partnership article! Try academic journals in political science or dispute resolution. --Bejnar (talk) 07:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dublin Principles, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.gwpforum.org/servlet/PSP?iNodeID=1345. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dublin Principles, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://rainwaterclub.org/dublin_principles.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)