Jump to content

User talk:HLong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability of Kevin Countermine

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kevin Countermine, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kevin Countermine seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kevin Countermine, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

[edit]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to ConsumerAffairs, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Additionally, please review WP:NPOV. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]