User talk:Hadolaven

Welcome!

Hello, Hadolaven, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Citations

When adding material based on journal articles, please provide a proper citation, which would include the authors, journal name, issue date, title of article, and page numbers. Please see WP:Citing sources. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk:Bioinitiative_Report#Corrected_the_attempt_to_legitimize_this_report_as_a_scientific_document

Hello, Hadolaven. You have new messages at Talk:Bioinitiative Report.
Message added 22:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Again, Re: Talk:Bioinitiative_Report#Corrected_the_attempt_to_legitimize_this_report_as_a_scientific_document

Hello, Hadolaven. You have new messages at Talk:Bioinitiative Report.
Message added 10:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Revert changes by Megabytehertz at Bioinitiative Report

User Megabytehertz (Megabytehertz (talk · contribs)) has once again added the same changes to the Bioinitiative Report article. Any chance you would consider reverting them? You can simply "undo" them by going to the article page, then clicking "View History" near the top of the page (or click this link which will bring up the history page). The first entry at the top should be that of User Megabytehertz. Click the Undo button at the right of the entry, then click Save at the bottom of the resulting edit page. I do not wish to be the only person reverting these changes (so far I have not been), as that would be problematic for me, and would make the case for an ANI, the next step where we report User Megabytehertz for improper behaviour, more difficult. I will start that process as soon as you have had a chance to revert the changes. Many thanks. --papageno (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

changes reverted - unfortnately I do not think this is good faith, confused or misguided editing by User Megabytehertz (Megabytehertz (talk · contribs)). The only reason given so far is the information comes from the report therefore is correct. But the constant change to playdown the one of the criticsms because the orgnisation has changed its name is also odd behaviour. Happy to assist in an case for an ANI. Hadolaven (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I think the calm, neutral, polite and persistent application of suggested WP policies has won the day: see the Bioinitiative Report Talk page and the User Talk page for Megabytehertz!

--papageno (talk) 22:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]