Jump to content

User talk:Harsh manutd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Harsh manutd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vensatry (Ping me) 10:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My reply to your comment in Indian numbering system page.

Repeating group of 3,2,2 is the right way of representing Indian numbers. The reason for number grouping is to easily understand what is written, and able to read it without counting the digits. Since Indian numbers are counted in crores this is the right way of representing them. Unicode doesn't accommodate repeating groups. It only supports single digit repetition or left most group different. This is a technical limitation in Unicode which should be addressed. That doesn't warrant changing the way people use numbers. Sivaraj 10:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sivaraj (talkcontribs)
@Sivaraj - can you share some sources where this is written. From what I could find, and from what school systems in North India are teaching, it's always been groupings of 2 except for the right-most 3 digits. Also, can you tell me your native state - as the 3,2,2 repeating pattern might be a local variation.
Another source: http://www.hindi.co/ginatee/numbers_saNkhyaaENn.html
Another source: http://veda.wikidot.com/sanskrit-numbers - Koti (crore) is 10^7 and Ayuta is 10^9 and Niyutam is 10^11 so why would the separators follow different pattern?

Nomination of Playlyfe for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playlyfe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playlyfe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]