User talk:Havok a

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jamie Borthwick has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ^StormRider 18:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Madeline Duggan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RaseaC (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Steve McFadden. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Thomas Law. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Grim²³ ★ 18:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Herald (album)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Herald (album), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Herald (album), without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Havok a. You have new messages at ConcernedVancouverite's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Havok a. You have new messages at ConcernedVancouverite's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Jamie Borthwick, you will be blocked from editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]