User talk:Hbk star2006

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Pathankot do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ginsengbomb (talk) 03:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 14:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hbk star2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

we feel sorry. we don't want to damage or disrupt wikipedia's information, it was happend due to lack of knowledge about wikipedia's policies. actully we feel our site (www.infopathankot.com) is having more information than other available websites on pathankot city. this type of mistake will never happen again. kindly unblock our account and please add our website's link (www.infopathankot.com), if you find our website is more informative than other websites of pathankot city.

Decline reason:

I strongly advise you read BFAQ for more information. The way you worded your request indicates that your account is being used on behalf of a company, and potentially by multiple users. This is against policy. Your account should represent you as an individual. Because this account is being used on behalf of a company or organization, I will not unblock this account. Regards, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request November 2011

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hbk star2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Sir, Myself Sachin Gupta - I really feel sorry for damaging the wikipedia's Information, it was happend due to lack of knowledge about wikipedia's policies. Please Approve this account, this kind of blunder will not happen again. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - no response to questions in >2 days. A new unblock request can be filed, as long as it responds to the questions below (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What sort of editing would you do if you were unblocked, assuming you couldn't edit concerning this concern? Daniel Case (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few questions that answering may help your request along. Please answer below here:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand what it means to have a conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?
What sort of subjects do you want to edit about?

Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 23:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]