User talk:HefsFold

I'm talking to myself! HefsFold (talk) 04:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Futue te ipsum[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Futue te ipsum, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sesamevoila (talk) 04:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Futue te ipsum[edit]

Hello HefsFold,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Futue te ipsum for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 04:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Latin phrases (F), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sesamevoila (talk) 04:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32 05:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HefsFold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not consider educating the public about Latin phrases vandalism. HefsFold (talk) 05:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nice try. Courcelles 05:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But abusing multiple accounts is also not allowed.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nor, should I say is posting penis pictures in articles. Per Jasper, compare to Proud2Bbi. --Jayron32 05:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't post penis pictures in articles. My roommate posted that when I was using the restroom. HefsFold (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's your roommate. You take care of him. He's not our problem. --Jayron32 05:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]