User talk:Henrimerton

Welcome!

Hello, Henrimerton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 19 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the McKenny baronets page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Green (horse racing) has been accepted

Chris Green (horse racing), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 20:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Henrimerton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

halhkmusic.com

The Halhkmusic.com links have moved to the G&S Archive and are accessible by clicking on the name of the musicals here: http://www.gsarchive.net/british/musicals.html I am not watching your page, so if you reply, please do so at my Talk page; however, I may not be able to respond until early next week. -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

British Newspaper Archive

I notice that you do not include author information for any of these newspaper articles (for example, in the Henry Hamilton article). Do *none* of them have a byline or name an author? By the way, we do not need to state the column, only the page number. I think it's simpler to omit it, especially if the name of the article is reasonably easy to spot on the page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point on authors, but all the ones here are anonymous. Occasionally, a few snippets have noms de plume for authorship, but not here. Most of the old newspapers are broadsheet and very closely typeset. For fleeting but important refs, they are sometimes very hard to spot on a page. Others are big articles or the page is set in a more 'artistic' style when the column refs are definitely superfluous. But I guess, on balance, we can lose them - anybody that is desperate to read an original reference will be OK in sourcing the article! Colin aka Henri Merton 08:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If no author name is given, of course there is nothing we can do about it. Just checking. Sometimes the theatre reviewers of particular newspapers are known (maybe from the masthead and initials or a pseudonym), even when no byline is given on the review. As long as you're looking out for the author name, that is fine. Thanks for doing the research! All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cingalee case

Great work on the Litigation section, but I left you a couple of hidden questions, which you can see by clicking the Edit tab in the article. Would you please take a look? -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, thanks for the edits and notes and I changed the flow somewhat as a result. NB The jury gave their verdict and costs very shortly after Anderson's letter was read which is why I said the jury had been swayed (ie overly swayed). Having moved the wit sentence to the previous paragraph, my instinct is that 'swayed' or similar could be reinserted. Colin aka Henri Merton 20:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Bovill

Thanks for the info which I have added to his article. Please let me know if you find any more. Jack1956 (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure and will do! Colin aka Henri Merton 21:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Henrimerton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

C. Hayden Coffin

Hi. Thanks for your edits to Hayden Coffin's article. I see that you added two cites to The Era (newspaper), but you did not give the title (heading). Often they used headings for these sorts of items, like "The Theatre". Can you look again? Also, please add the page number for each of those cites. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See exactly what you mean. But nothing to do with me! Those edits are 'ancient' (3 Apr 2008) in Wiki terms and I just worked around the text. I'll look for the reference (it goes nowhere at the mo - try it!) and update it when I get a sec. Likewise I'm going to move that 'listen' down to the actual gramaphone link. Colin aka Henri Merton 07:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That audio move was a palaver!!! Colin aka Henri Merton 08:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cites sorted out Colin aka Henri Merton 08:50, 16 January 2019 (UTC)::::[reply]

Thanks for adding the titles and page numbers. -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:56, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lester Piggott

FYI: Lester Piggott is a candidate for In The News. SethWhales^talk 09:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]