User talk:Heracy
Re. edits to Discordianism
[edit]You accuse me of not checking facts. I have; what you provide does not meet the standards of reliable sources.
What you seem to forget is that, according to the Principia Discordia, the path of maximum creativity includes order as well as chaos. The purpose of the Wikipedia article for Discordianism is to be an ordered explanation of the principles, ethics and values of Our Lady. Putting in nonsense does not further that purpose. Doing it once, ok that can be funny. Repetitively putting in the same nonsense stops being funny and becomes deliberate damage to an article that represents the consensus of a lot of editors over time.
If you feel that your contribution is valid, you must provide proof that it is valid, citing verifiable reliable sources that represent a neutral point of view and which do not include any original research. Also, your contribution must fit in with the article as a whole and the subject it is covering. The Wikipedia is not an appropriate forum to express your uninhibited creativity. TechBear (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)