User talk:Herr P. schreibt

Italian History VI moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Italian History VI, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Please note that while foreign language sources can be reliable sources, none of the sources currently cited by the article can be considered reliable for determining notability.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill, I am... well, how shall I put it... a little bit confused. Two sources from reputable (international) print magazines and one (imho) reputable German online source are not enough. How many sources do I need? In my humble opinion GNG was met. --DMF-Muster (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DMF-Muster: Going by the sources that are currently provided, I'd say that Rock Hard appears to be reliable but is possibly too short to meet the "in-depth" requirement. The Heavy Metal Pages citation appears to be an interview with the band, so it's neither in-depth coverage of the subject (the album Italian History VI) nor sufficiently independent to demonstrate notability. The coverage in Stormbringer is not sufficiently in-depth, as it's a collection of short assessments of several albums. I will say that these are all very borderline cases--there doesn't appear to be any existing consensus on the quality of these sources on the reliable sources noticeboard, and if you want to make a case for these sources you can start a thread there. I'd say that if you can find either similar-depth coverage in a more solidly reliable source, or more in-depth coverage in a metal magazine that isn't blatantly unreliable I'd support moving the article to mainspace. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Thx for the quick reply. The Polish magazine features Alltheniko twice: with an interview and the review on page 167 (I added that information in the reference). I will add other sources, and once I am done... I will send another ping. Bye for now. --DMF-Muster (talk) 18:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Here's the ping... I added some more reviews that imho look like in depth coverage. At least the linked print magazines with reviews are reliable (the other mentioned international print magazines are not available online... :-( ), Metal Express Radio with a long history (as well as being a "real aired" show before moving online 2000 or so) and Metal Temple with an international staff on different continents seem reliable as well. What do you think? --DMF-Muster (talk) 20:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DMF-Muster: looks good to me. I'm not familiar with the sources in question, so it's not impossible that another editor with more experience working on metal articles will disagree, but I'm ok with moving this to mainspace as notability has IMO been demonstrated. My one additional comment would be that I don't think that it's necessary to split up the reception section based on the medium of coverage though, having them all under one header should be fine. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trinity Records Hong Kong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trinity Records Hong Kong, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Records Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]