User talk:HetmanWL

Welcome to my Talk page.

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Poland. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. E-960 (talk) 09:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no. It's you who is reverting my stuff. HetmanWL (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. E-960 (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bbb23 User:Bbb23 please respond HetmanWL (talk) 03:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HetmanWL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry? You're assuming me to be some user I don't even know? This is absurd, but how can I even prove I'm not that user? Can't you check my IP address and that of that user Urabura? Wild. Does Wikipedia work like that, that some user with a greater number of edits can accuse a less experienced user of anything and it flies? I hereby plead to all resources in Wikipedia's possession to undo this injustice by checking out that I am NOT some Urabura, it's even absurd that I should prove my innocence to you and not the other way round. I don't know what else to say as, simply, a completely different person. Check the IPs, do whatever, but you will find that I am not that person for that is the simple reality. In fact I expect an apology. I added a source to an edit, I did the needful, did nothing wrong no edit warring, and after the more experienced user found it doubtful without a proper reference to back it up, I added the source. Please sirs, review this suspicion, I am not Urabura, and beg you to unblock because I promise I will not ever infringe upon Wikipedia policy. HetmanWL (talk) 02:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HetmanWL (talk) 02:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technical (CU) data shows Possible here but I definitely can't say anything stronger than that. Urabura has not edited since 2023-12-13 and this account was not created until 2023-12-16. --Yamla (talk) 12:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it normal to be banned just because an admin feels like it? Because this is basically what this comes down to. HetmanWL (talk) 12:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked and found this: in [1] the user re-removed Szczecin from the city list and stated agreement with Urabura in the edit message. Also, the initial text of HetmanWL's user page [2] was the same as of an account of a sockpuppeteer who also recently edited the Poland article, Malecide [3], which is a bit suspicious IMO. NicolausPrime (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[4] makes me wonder if HetmanWL may also be linked to User:Shqian, User:Retois, both blocked by CU, I assume as socks. NicolausPrime (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all these IPs from across the world are 1 person, personally targeting you. HetmanWL (talk) 09:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HetmanWL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Per what? My IP is unique, my own. I am no one's sockpuppet, I don't even know what you're accusing me of. Furthermore, I didn't violate 3RR, it was not my intention ever to join any edit war and will not ever violate Wikipedia policy. I request a removal of this ban because I am not a sockpuppet of anybody and it is double absurd to accuse me of being "some" user withot even specifying who. Shameful. HetmanWL (talk) 11:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per the above discussion. Socks be socks. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked TPA because of the (now removed) legal threat.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]