User talk:Hippo43/Archives/2018/March

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Denis Betts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wayne Bennett

Man of the match (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Most Outstanding Player

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

"How many props in a rugby league scrum"

Hi Hippo43, "How many props in a rugby league scrum" would make a good pub-quiz question… I doubt if anyone but you (and now me) would answer correctly with "One". I'd be interesting to see whether the terminology is consistent in RFL, NFL, and international variations of rugby league rules. Best regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Interesting. The NRL/ARL (2018) and the RFL both have that section. The RLIF (2018) version which appears otherwise basically identical to the NRL version, leaves out the list. It still includes the text "these positions being referred to by name and number as set out hereunder", but the list "hereunder" has gone.

Also, the glossary in each version describes Prop and Loosehead as different forwards, which maybe explains it. --hippo43 (talk) 23:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Jordan Peterson order

Please stop reverting if two editors did not agree with you, and take it to the talk page.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 05:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

@Miki Filigranski:Thanks for getting in touch. The guideline is clear. Sections should be in chronological order. Lists of works can be in reverse chronological order if editors prefer. I don't care either way, but a non-chronological list is incorrect. --hippo43 (talk) 06:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Are you aware that you made over WP:3RR, started an edit-war instead to follow WP:BRD and start as asked (!) a discussion the article's talk page? The placement of the book as the third is also non-chronological considering the content of "Other projects". I won't make another revert, instead want you to start the discussion on the talk page and hear other editors opinion, including @Hrodvarsson: rather edit-warring.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 06:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again. The guideline is clear. Your interpretation is incorrect, as I'm sure you understand. Your edit summary here, was disingenuous, selectively quoting from the guideline. I don't know why you are fighting over it. If you want to re-sequence the material in Other Projects, I don't mind at all. Happy to discuss it at the talk page. --hippo43 (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Do you want to be reported for edit-warring? You again reverted another editor @Marteau: could you stop? Do you even listen what I say, I said that the book release was after every event mentioned in the "Other projects" hence the book should be placed according to your logic as the fourth section, not re-sequencing the content in the "Other projects" section itself.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

@Miki Filigranski:You're right, I misunderstood your point about Other projects. (Although there is overlap between his Youtube stuff and his Biblical lectures). The other projects stuff should be included chronologically. I don't mind if it's in reverse order or not. Happy to carry on discussion at the talk page if you prefer. --hippo43 (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denis Betts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wayne Bennett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)