User talk:Holderowner
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Hdayejr (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
May 2008
[edit] This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Dayewalker, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Wildthing61476 (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Get rid of editors who are runing this site, and you wouldn't get comments like that from me. Did Jimbo Wales have this kind of thing in mind when he made this site? I am only trying to improve the project, now please stay off my talk page boy. Holderowner (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Why won't the edit feature work. Holderowner (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
--Orange Mike | Talk 17:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Holderowner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unjustified, no reason or links given.
Decline reason:
Your contributions and comments make it clear you are not here to build an encyclopedia. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.