User talk:Hombre ocho del hacha

I'm New[edit]

Let me know how I can help this siteHombre ocho del hacha (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Hombre ocho del hacha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Just follow the links. Good luck! ResMar 19:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test[edit]

Erasing

"TESTING" 'TEST' 19:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

More Testing[edit]

Erased

1

2

3

4

end test Hombre ocho del hacha (talk) 19:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for evading a ban through sockpuppets. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 19:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|testing on how to edit Hombre ocho del hacha (talk) 19:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hombre ocho del hacha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

testing on how to edit

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, which is the use of multiple accounts to avoid a block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hombre ocho del hacha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it says: evading a ban through sockpuppets. I am just trying to edit. what am I evading? Thank you

Decline reason:

Your block. GARDEN 20:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The username is an attempt at a Spanish translation of "Axmann8", an indef-blocked user. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 20:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you bugs. Is this name a problem? I copied a name I liked in Spanish. It is closer to "8th man of the axe". Do you know why I am getting these boxes? Hombre ocho del hacha (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's so painfully boring when blocked users come back with depressingly obvious new accounts, then deny that they are who they manifestly are. It hurts my feelings a little, how dumb they think I am. But I get over it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How dumb do you have to be to sock with a name that's little more then a foreign translation of you last account? ResMar 20:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]