User talk:Hoseinkandovan

Please unblock me. Hello. Good morning. I am a journalist in the field of music and film, I made good articles on Wikipedia, my effort is to submit good articles on Iranian films and artists. I made an article called (Ali Tajdari) and I think a group was colluding to delete this article. so I asked my friends to comment on the article in person and I created a username for them, so I was blocked, I did not question the rules of Wikipedia, I did not do anything wrong but I realized that I should not ask my friends to comment. During this time I was able to make about seven hundred edits to improve Wikipedia and I want to continue in this way. Please remove me from the block if possible so that I can serve Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 16:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith Please unblock me Hello. Have a good time. I am a journalist in the field of music and film, I made good articles on Wikipedia, my effort is to submit good articles on Iranian films and artists. I made an article called (Ali Tajdari) and I think a group was colluding to delete this article. so I asked my friends to comment on the article in person and I created a username for them, so I was blocked, I did not question the rules of Wikipedia, I did not do anything wrong but I realized that I should not ask my friends to comment. During this time I was able to make about seven hundred edits to improve Wikipedia and I want to continue in this way. Please remove me from the block if possible so that I can serve Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 16:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 50550 and unblock discussion.

UTRS appeal #50550 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deepfriedokra

Thank you for giving me the opportunity.

If you can see my article about Ali Tajdary (I think a group is colluding to remove that article, the article is credible, the artist is well known and has the perfect criteria for having a biography on Wikipedia, links are the most valid links are. I am an art journalist in Iran. if an article is not appropriate, I will never submit it to Wikipedia. I believe that this article deserves to be registered. please review that article if possible, thank you.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

|Chekuser Hello.good time I'm sentenced to socks with a user named (AT Wiki), I do not know this person. I did not make a mistake, please check again.did not create this username and I have nothing to do with it.I was sentenced to one month in block without making this mistake,thank you

Hoseinkandovan (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoseinkandovan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sir Sputnik Unblocke Hello, good night, I did not send any new messages under any other username. Please check again, it was probably wrong, I could not leave any more messages since I was blocked yesterday.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sir Sputnik Yesterday I asked to leave the block and I did not enter with any other name. Please check it, I must be wrong. I abide by the rules of Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sir Sputnik Hi, I saw Ali Tajdary aricle and found out that a user named (A d viki) commented on my article and talk. I entered his page and saw that you blocked him because he was wearing socks. I never know (A d viki) and it is never my page. I saw his edit. He has been editing the page (list of Iranian singers), probably seeing and commenting on "Ali Tajdary" article,I do not know her, you can investigate. I did not do anything wrong. I intend to submit important Iranian articles to Wikipedia. Please review this decision is wrong with me, thank you--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

|checkuser=Hoseinkandovan

Hi, I'm sentenced to socks with a user named (AT Wiki), I do not know this person. I did not make a mistake, please check again.did not create this username and I have nothing to do with it.I was sentenced to one month in block without making this mistake Hoseinkandovan (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deepfriedokra please review

Heloo,good time

you gave me a discount and ordered me to leave the block after a week. i did not make another mistake, but i was accused of socks again by another manager. if you can check, i did not make a mistake, but i was accused and my username was blocked. increased by one month, I was happy after your message that I can work on Wikipedia again in a week, but for no reason I was sentenced to be blocked for another month by another administrator. This is not fair because I did not make any mistake. Please check if you can,thank you.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser-Alireza Khabib

hi, this sockpuppet username User:Alireza Khabib is one of the users because as soon as it was entered in wikipedia, it commented on the deletion of (Ali Tajdary) articles. please check. he is a fake user.It is clear that she is a sockpuppet Hoseinkandovan (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

user:Alireza Khabib sockpuppet

hi, this sockpuppet username User:Alireza Khabib is one of the users because as soon as it was entered in wikipedia, it commented on the deletion of (Ali Tajdary) articles. please check. he is a fake user.It is clear that she is a sockpuppet Hoseinkandovan (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoseinkandovan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, good time, I was once accused of socks and it was my fault and I confessed, but my mistake was to ask my friends to suggest using my computer to save an article.one of the senior administrators of wikipedia blocked me for a week and i was happy to be able to work on wikipedia again after a week and that administrator was kind to me,That did not block me forever.but i was accused again while i was innocent and i did not do anything (sockspuppet) and i did not make any mistake and i was accused again for a month of blocking, i did not make a mistake again because i would like to submit important iranian articles in wikipedia, please check , i did not make a mistake,I wrote good articles in a short period of time and I made good progress. I do not want to do wrong. I just want to help Wikipedia progress and I did not make any mistakes, but I was accused. Please take me out of the block.tahnk you--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Significant checkuser confirmed evidence of socking. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoseinkandovan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, good time, I was once accused of socks and it was my fault and I confessed, but my mistake was to ask my friends to suggest using my computer to save an article.one of the senior administrators of wikipedia blocked me for a week and i was happy to be able to work on wikipedia again after a week and that administrator was kind to me,That did not block me forever.but i was accused again while i was innocent and i did not do anything (sockspupet) and i did not make any mistake and i was accused again for a month of blocking, i did not make a mistake again because i would like to submit important iranian articles in wikipedia, please check , i did not make a mistake,I wrote good articles in a short period of time and I made good progress. I do not want to do wrong. I just want to help Wikipedia progress and I did not make any mistakes, but I was accused. I was accused of sockspuppet with the username (A D wikinevis) but I never did that, check the IPs, check the location, This is a mutual understanding and my right has been violated, Wikipedia is a large and global organization, it has experienced managers،I ask the managers to check to correct this mistake، Please take me out of the block.thank you.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Based on your repeated personal attacks and repeating the same requests after having them declined, it's clear you should not be editing on our site at this time. I have switched your block to indef, and turned off talkpage access. DMacks (talk) 15:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Several things:
1. Checkuser has already confirmed you to A.T wikinevis (see User talk:A.T wikinevis),
2) editing wikipedia is not a "right",
3) there are no "managers" on wikipedia, we have admins who are volunteers. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lavalizard101

Firstly, every user can make a mistake and blocking me again was a mistake. Secondly, I did not talk to you. You are on my page from morning to night. Do your job. Thirdly, you do not have enough information. They have a higher technical level. These issues do not concern you. Do not interfere. My letter was to senior managers, not you. Do not waste all your time on my page. Put aside hostility. Wikipedia is not a place of hostility--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 13:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lavalizard101 You comment negatively on all my articles, you answer every text I write. Did I call you, are you the CEO, do you have the ability to block or unblock ?, Do you decide Are you the ultimate recipient of articles? No, you are not one of them, you are very young, you are looking for hostility, not doing useful work.

as for articles, you should know that wikipedias suggestion is to register articles, not delete a valuable article unnecessarily.

you will not grow up with hostility and unnecessary criticism. finally,wikipedia will notice your hostility.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 13:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lavalizard101 You also made a big mistake about deleting the article (Ali Tajdari), you consider the person who has played the lead role in seven valuable Iranian films and series and won the festival award in two films as insignificant. Will someone who is not famous and credible be cast as the lead actor in seven popular movies and series?

It has extensive and meaningful music and its songs have been published on Iranian television and radio, and the film's title track has been serial. Do they put the songs of a singer who is not famous and meaningful on the credits of the most watched Iranian series?

There is all this, do you expect the news of an Iranian artist to be published in the English media? Your judgment was completely wrong, and in any case, if you do not intend to be an enemy, it is better to check the article again to change your mind. it is not logical to deny all this, it is just hostility.

Of course, you are at enmity with me, I have not come for enmity, I, as a music and art journalist in Iran, seek to record valuable Iranian articles, not enmity with other users.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 13:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK you are not permitted to remove already removed unblock requests. You are being unneccesarily hostile towards me, this may count against you being unblocked. As I have said before Wikipedia does not have "managers" no one has "jobs" on wikipedia, everyone on wikipedia is a volunteer. "you do not have enough information. They have a higher technical level" a checkuser with the technical ability (@Ponyo: has already checkuser confirmed you with A.T wikinevis. Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lavalizard101

You are an enemy. You have a heart full of resentment, I have nothing to say to you. Do your best and be an enemy. It does not matter.I will not answer you anymore, look for enmity from morning to night. By the way, you are not a senior manager, you are just an ordinary user and you are not a decision maker, you are just an ordinary user with a heart full of resentment.--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been nothing but civil with you and have been met with nothing but hostility from you.

"You are an enemy. You have a heart full of resentment" I am not your enemy I am trying to help you, how can I be full of resentment when I have not been unfair or angry towards you. "you are not a senior manager" as I have said there is no such thing as a manager or senior manager on Wikipedia there are admins who are volunteers. Given that you are now displaying slight IDHT in that regard I would suggest that the next admin, extend the block indefinitely and revoke TPA for WP:IDHT, WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality etc. Lavalizard101 (talk) 14:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lavalizard101: Maybe we all been too hard on the guy, and instead of solving it in a civil way we went into a child-like behaviors of blocks and reblocks? What I am saying is that maybe user:A T wikinevis isn't a sockpuppet of Hoseinkandovan? As he said in the above posts (if you read them), he is a part of a company, which means that A T wikinevis account can not be directly link to him. Am I being clear in my assumptions? In particularly, I was referring to So I asked my friends to comment on the article in person and I created a username for them, so I was blocked, I did not question the rules of Wikipedia, I did not do anything wrong but I realized that I should not ask my friends to comment.--Filmomusico (talk) 19:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That would still be against policy, WP:MEAT, there battleground approach towards me here would have been enough for its own block, and besides, I was being civil, their was no child-like behaviour on anyone else but this user. Lavalizard101 (talk) 19:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The block is based on behavioural evidence as well as technical. Lavalizard101 (talk) 19:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Just thought it might shed the light. :)--Filmomusico (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[nil This Lavalizard101 spends all her time for enmity with me and requests the removal of all my articles From morning till night on my page is trying to block me, Please review all reviews and posts of this idiot, is Wikipedia is a hostile place? Does this person have the right to threaten to block me? Like her, I do not ask for her removal, but please warn her.Her heart is full of resentment, Wikipedia is not a place for resentment،--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)] ([[User talk:This Lavalizard101 spends all her time for enmity with me and requests the removal of all my articles From morning till night on my page is trying to block me, Please review all reviews and posts of this idiot, is Wikipedia is a hostile place? Does this person have the right to threaten to block me? Like her, I do not ask for her removal, but please warn her.Her heart is full of resentment, Wikipedia is not a place for resentment،--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)|talk]]^{[nil +]} · [nil tag] · [[Special:Contributions/This Lavalizard101 spends all her time for enmity with me and requests the removal of all my articles From morning till night on my page is trying to block me, Please review all reviews and posts of this idiot, is Wikipedia is a hostile place? Does this person have the right to threaten to block me? Like her, I do not ask for her removal, but please warn her.Her heart is full of resentment, Wikipedia is not a place for resentment،--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/This Lavalizard101 spends all her time for enmity with me and requests the removal of all my articles From morning till night on my page is trying to block me, Please review all reviews and posts of this idiot, is Wikipedia is a hostile place? Does this person have the right to threaten to block me? Like her, I do not ask for her removal, but please warn her.Her heart is full of resentment, Wikipedia is not a place for resentment،--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)|deleted contribs]] · logs · filter log · [[Special:Block/This Lavalizard101 spends all her time for enmity with me and requests the removal of all my articles From morning till night on my page is trying to block me, Please review all reviews and posts of this idiot, is Wikipedia is a hostile place? Does this person have the right to threaten to block me? Like her, I do not ask for her removal, but please warn her.Her heart is full of resentment, Wikipedia is not a place for resentment،--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)|block user]] · block log · [[:m:Special:CentralAuth/This Lavalizard101 spends all her time for enmity with me and requests the removal of all my articles From morning till night on my page is trying to block me, Please review all reviews and posts of this idiot, is Wikipedia is a hostile place? Does this person have the right to threaten to block me? Like her, I do not ask for her removal, but please warn her.Her heart is full of resentment, Wikipedia is not a place for resentment،--Hoseinkandovan (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)|CA]] · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. DMacks (talk) 15:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And yet he's still block evading with IPs User:2a01:5ec0:b003:ec19:9cb6:2b98:22cf:8121 and User:2A01:5EC0:B806:EE05:ECC6:25EC:B94A:8E86. 219.251.78.18 (talk) 01:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fourth Round poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fourth Round poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Original poster of the Special Love Line series.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Original poster of the Special Love Line series.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Poster of the Plaque.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Poster of the Plaque.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Butterfly poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Butterfly poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Uncensored With Ali Tajdary poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Uncensored With Ali Tajdary poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]