User talk:Hugha

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Dr. Dre, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- Tckma 03:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to T.I.. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Georgia Peachez 02:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Doughboy

DJ Doughboy has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Thank you for the polite message on my talk page--a lot of people lose their cool when an article they started is proposed for deletion. Of course, I didn't actually propose it for deletion myself--see the page history[1]. And I can not personally delete it, since I'm not an admin. What I was actually doing was checking to make sure you knew about the possibility of it being deleted.

Did you read WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO? That will give you the standards that the article has to meet. If this guy meets those standards, make sure the article says so and backs it up with sources. You're free to remove the prod notice yourself, but if you don't improve the article first, don't be surprised if someone who still thinks it should be deleted refers the case to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where you'd have a chance to explain your reasoning and try to convince other editors the article is appropriate for Wikipedia. Let me know if you still have any questions. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: DJ Doughboy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that DJ Doughboy meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Doughboy. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Robertissimo 11:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Elemeno P

Your recent edit to Elemeno P (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about the "Westgrove OGs"

I would be happy to see an article on this gang in the Wikipedia if the article came with some verifiable references - say, local newspaper articles, court records, stuff like that - and also some idea of why this gang, among the many gangs around the world, is notable - this might be, say, a government ministry in NZ declaring them "public enemy number one", or a series of particularly violent acts which police officials decide are a new low for New Zealand crime. On the other hand, if this is a small local gang much like many others, I don't think it needs an article in the international Wikipedia, and evidently neither do other editors here. --Brianyoumans 03:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]