User talk:IAMwhatsIAM

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sock puppet of Cognition.
Please refer to editing habits, contributions and/or any sockpuppetry investigations for evidence.
This policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs – abuse log

I was blocked in my previous incarnation by the dark side of the force. Can't we all get along? --IAMwhatsIAM 06:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why I am

I will edit to keep Wikipedia clean. That is my goal. I am a warrior with a lover's heart. --IAMwhatsIAM 06:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My best advice is to try WP:AN/I, but it's a tough crowd. Everyking 07:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I raised the issue of SlimVirgin's behavior regarding your Vote for Deletion at WP:AN/I, but the one response was supportive of SlimVirgin. I would suggest a less radical approach. Meanwhile, another editor has corrected some of the most egregious defects of that article. You might want to raise the question, on the discussion page, of the article being largely a mirror for the "Justice for Jeremiah" site -- Wikipedia frowns on that sort of thing, at least in theory. --HK 07:38, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with the above user. One thing that you should learn when contributing to Wikipedia is that some admins are not only corrupt, but have a corrupt following. SlimVirgin is one of these admins. Your approach is a bit heavy-handed, and that's not going to work - you are dealing with a cabal. I'm sorry that you have been treated in such an unwelcome manner. Personally, I welcome you.

I find it plausible that what SlimVirgin is calling "disruption" were simply edits made in good faith to improve Wikipedia. ("Disruption" is a catch-phrase of this admin). I would advise, however, that you not tag the article, or any related articles, for AFD again. Edit with caution, and try to avoid significant edits to any articles that SlimVirgin and Friends™ 'own'. Good luck with your contributions. Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 09:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all. --IAMwhatsIAM 05:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I have blocked you temporarily for vandalism for resubmitting Jeremiah Duggan for deletion. Your editing is in violation of an arbitration-committee ruling, which prohibits editors from appearing to act in a way that promotes the ideas of Lyndon LaRouche. You can read the details at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche 2. If you return after your block and want to continue editing, you'll have to abide by those rulings and edit in accordance with our editing policies, particularly WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and WP:V, which I encourage you to read. If, however, you engage in any more disruption, you're likely to be blocked indefinitely. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 07:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having discussed this issue with other admins and a member of the Arbitration Committee, I've blocked this account indefinitely for disruption, suspected sockpuppetry, and violations of Lyndon LaRouche 1 and 2. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]