User talk:Ibn Nader

April 2020[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Muzaffarids (Iran). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Also, i suggest you desist from labeling as "nationalist" other users' contributions, especially when they are sourced. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the sources I provided. The previous material had no sources.

The source does not say "Persianate" but Persian, stop misusing it.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was a clarification that they were not an ethnic Persian dynasty. That source also says they were of Arab origin, why did you remove that? I also added information about the Muzaffarids restoring orthodox Sunnism and pledging allegiance to the Abbasid Caliph in Cairo, I provided sources, why did you remove that? Ibn Nader (talk) 23:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You misuse what the source says, it says "a Persian dynasty. Their ancestors came from Arabia and had settled in Ḵh̲urāsān at the time of the Muslim conquest" you changed that with "Persianate dynasty of Arab origin".---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not "misuse" it. It was not a direct quote. I was using the source to word a more accurate state. I just learned how to use the Talk page, we can carry this on over there. I provided sources for the other information and there is no reason why it would be removed.Ibn Nader (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Muzaffarids (Iran) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]