User talk:IceUnshattered/ArchivesSeptember 2008

Re: Vandalism revert

Oh, of course! I'm happy to do it. Have a nice day! :D Miquonranger03 (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

lol

[1] yes, i successfully hid my penchant for small case from the rfa participants at my rfa =) –xeno (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

-evil laugh- It is a secret no longer. (Now I should actually be looking into the RfA candidates instead of picking out grammar errors. But of course, I'm not.) IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 21:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

re: great work

Thanks so much, and same to you. I hope I can keep it up, what with school starting and such, but nothing can keep me away from anti-vandalism work here. :D miquonranger03 (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

re User:96.56.210.210

Yeah, you're right - there should have been no "past final warning" since, as you point out, there were none. I guess I just added that due to force of habit. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks tor responding. Never been an admin, so I suppose that's understandable. IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 20:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

"Casper" Whitney

You "reverted" as "unconstructive" my statement in the article "Casper Whitney" that the correct spelling was "Caspar Whitney" and that an article already existed under the correct spelling. So what is the constructive way to make this known to readers? FLAHAM (talk) 01:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

o.O I do make mistakes, too. It seems that you are probably correct in this situation, ad I'm not sure about it. My apologies. IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 21:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Edit-warring with ClueBot

(cur) (last) 23:24, 11 September 2008 Werdna (Talk | contribs | block) m (Protected User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Calvin 1998: To remove the need to edit-war with ClueBot. Please unprotect when ClueBot stops making mistakes. [edit=sysop:move=sysop] (expires 11:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC))) (undo)

You owe me a cookie. — Werdna • talk 11:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I certainly do. -hugs really really hard- Thank you! Well, you should be going to Calvin, it's his page that's getting edit warred over. Expect a cookie sometime soon :) IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 21:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi IceUnshattered. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. It is very much appreciated. :) The RfA was closed as successful with 73 supports, 3 opposes and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank WBOSITG for nominating me. Best wishes and thanks again, —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

The Royal Militia of Pokeynutity

You are offered a place in the Royal Militia of Pokeynutity as a General. The positions are given out on a first in, first served, basis, so please decide ASAP. ~ The Rebel's Gone Pokeynuts LOL 02:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I accept! -buahahaha- (Now I'm a Royal Militia General! Phear meh!) IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 21:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, the places for General have already been taken. You are now a Lieutenant General. ~ Her Holy Jamoley Highness Rebel Queen Pokeynut 12:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Question

Hey can you get whoever to delete the revisions on my pages? Whatever has to happen to the pages, like deleting the page, is fine with me. --TheSeaIsBlue (talk) 19:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Er, I'm not sure what you mean. Can you clarify? Is something happening to your user page? Are you requesting that a user subpage be deleted? Are you requesting WP:Oversight? IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 20:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Owait... I think I know what you're asking. Yeah, I think your best bet would be to tag it w/ speedy deletion "as requested by page creator". If you have WP:TW Twinkle, it's really easy. Once the page is deleted, no non-admins will be able to see the page or its revisions, from what I know, unless the admin provdes it to the user, which probably won't happen unless it's for a good reason. IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 22:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Deleting, I guess... I'm unsure of how to do this, so can you get whoever needs to know to delete both my user and user talk page? I really just don't like the revisions being there. --TheSeaIsBlue (talk) 19:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. For your userpage and talk page, I'd recommend putting a {{db-userreq}} or {{db-u1}} template (they're the same thing). Just stick one of those templates at the top of both pages. Once the template is up on the page, the page should be deleted soon. To read up more on the speedy deletion policy, I'll direct you to this page. Hope that helped :) IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 20:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll use the first one. As long as it gets deleted, I'm fine with it. --TheSeaIsBlue (talk) 16:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Looks like all's good with the first page, but they want you to write some more with your talk page. IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 22:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

What? Whatever it takes, tell them. --TheSeaIsBlue (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah, from the redlinks it looks like it's all done now. That was pretty clean, thankfully. IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 01:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :) --TheSeaIsBlue (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)