Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - BanyanTree 01:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. - BanyanTree 02:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Look, make a new account. The message you'll get will screw up the browser. I was posting on MediaWiki talk:Welcomecreation because what they did forced me to reload wikipedia! The admin that blocked me had no reason, I removed the bad title I had and my post had no offense lagnauge. I made that joke edit on Talk:Main Page for fun, but the MediaWiki stuff was real. This admin had no right to block me.
Decline reason:
Edits such as [1] and [2] make this block justified, there's no reason for stuff like that. Wait the 24 hours and then come back and edit constructively. When you are unblocked, you might want to bring up your problem with the welcome screen at the village pump (technical) — John Reaves(talk) 03:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
And I've left a note on MediaWiki talk:Welcomecreation and the talk page of the blocking admin requesting this block be reversed. You concern was valid, no matter how poorly a choice of words. This block, and the extension, are not appropriate. - auburnpilottalk 03:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Someone whose first edit is to make fun of Raul on Talk:Main Page obviously isn't a new user and obviously isn't here to be constructive. John Reaves(talk) 03:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is what warnings are for. We do not block people for one time offenses. And "hint" there's more than one Raul in the world. - auburnpilottalk 03:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did you look at the diff? It's pretty obvious whick Raul he is talking about. John Reaves(talk) 03:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
