User talk:Ikh

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ikh has not edited Wikipedia since September 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Howdy.

Thank you very much for your feedback. I understand your concerns. I read the no original thought policy and I can assure you "The Entrepreneur of Life" is neither original research/invention nor part of a personal essay. But you are right about the sources: I always provide references and sources but I must admit that the sources in this article were hidden at first - as invisible comments in the source code - because I had to verify the exact titles of the main sources first and come up with a reasonable translation. So long.

T.

Comparative military ranks of World War II

This may be a bad idea, but let me toss in a thought or two into this dispute. Given that the main disagreement seems to be over whether rank X in one country is equivalent to rank Y in another country, it may be a good idea to

indicate that this is a rough comparison and in some cases may not be entirely accurate
(this is quite tedious) list on this talk page, for each rank: the responsibilities, the sizes/types of the units under command, the next highest and lowest ranks, etc., and then have a discussion over which ranks are equivalent. This should make things much clearer, the decisions over rough equivalences of ranks should be easier, and these decisions would be harder to oppose.

These are my two cents; maybe it's a bad idea, but seems to me like worth trying. ikh (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ikh! In a bottom of my page is Note that there is considerable debate as to the exact equivalency of officers of OF-6 equivalent rank and above. May be we can make to us more detailed Note? I ADD in a bottom to my page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_military_ranks_of_World_War_II/temp - Hierarchy of military organisation. What do you think about it?-Tt1 19:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

sorry about that! i was merely trying to help "pump up the crowd." i am unbiased as to who won. Jthurman (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, np. We do have to try to maintain some visual quality.. hence reversion. ikh (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately succeeded with votes of 52/1/2, so I am now an administrator. Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

—bbatsell ¿? 05:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey, no prob, always willing to support good candidates... in either case, adminship is "no big deal" ikh (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you
Hello Ikh, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 63/4/3. I am honoured by the community support and pledge to serve the project as best as I can. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 16:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you very much for your support during my recent Admin election, I appreciate the trust that you have put in me. Please contact me if you have any questions, comments or concerns regarding my work as an admin.

Kind Regards, Elf-friend 07:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my IRC and WP nicks

my IRC nick is "ikh", same as my WP one. ikh (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: References

Hey Thanks for the tip, i really appreciate it..i have articles from mags and newspapers that i can add in, thanks alot for the tip, i really appreciate someone actually giving tips, rather than being an ass and discouraging me from doing anything--Cypherous 16:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Entrepreneur of Life

Talk:Entrepreneur of Life, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Entrepreneur of Life and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Entrepreneur of Life during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Meclee (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Matrix(mathematics)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Matrix(mathematics) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Matrix(mathematics) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]