User talk:In2itionmedia
Conflict of interest
[edit]
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Patrick Murphy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked without further warning.
For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
The content added is nothing more than public knowledge.
June 2007
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jamie Eldridge. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
The revert on Patrick Murphy is unwarranted and displays a bias within Wikipedia.