User talk:Intensity254

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Secrets (post-hardcore band)[edit]

Please note a PROD is a one off - if anyone removes a PROD it can not be added back - PROD is one-shot only: It must not be used for articles PRODed before - Wikipedia:Proposed deletion)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Question about your recent page move[edit]

Hi.

I was wondering if you could explain this page move. It doesn't seem to have any real reason to be moved, and I wasn't sure why you did that. Thanks! J.delanoygabsadds 04:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Intensity254. I started a section about this at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Flyer22 (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Intensity254 has responded on my talk page about this. Flyer22 (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Since you've not acknowledged reading the AN/I report about your edits, let me repeat some if it here:

Your response to Flyer22 is a classic example of WP:BROTHER. Since there are a number of other questionable edits in your contibution history -- like the April 6 move of Tracy Morgan to Panda Bears(Movie Man) and from there to Tracy Jordan (Actor), and the April 8 replacement of 115K of text from List of Doctor Who serials with "Hi Peter" -- you should be aware that you' are responsible for the edits made using your account, no matter what family member made them, and you can be sanctioned (i.e. blocked from editing) for them. You should try to be more careful about staying logged in in the future. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alex Smith. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I am warning the other editor as well.Bagumba (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

You also still have yet to give a reason for your reverts. Now I will formally ask, why?--Rockchalk717 20:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Berzerk (song). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. STATic message me! 15:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)