User talk:Ipstenu/2008
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ipstenu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This archive page covers approximately the dates between January 2008 and December 2008.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.
Wonder woman vandal
Well, whoever your message was for probably didn't get it. This is a Qwest DSL IP address, so the address tends to change every few days. Sorry. 71.32.173.110 (talk) 00:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- And I just realized that was from quite some time ago. I guess other people who have had this IP must not be casual wikipedia broswers! 00:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.173.110 (talk)
AfD nomination of Shane Casey
An editor has nominated Shane Casey, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Casey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Firebrand1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Firebrand1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GriffenGrey-Flash.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GriffenGrey-Flash.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Section length, Book titles, et al.
Hi. Can you read this section and then offer your opinion on the points raised? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)