User talk:Iqacquire

May 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michelle Goldberg. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Guettarda (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Michelle Goldberg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are currently at three reverts. One more will result in a block. Guettarda (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

Please stop adding original research to Michelle Goldberg. The criminal codes you are citing do not specifically mention Goldberg. If you continue to violate biographies of living persons policy – or frivolously accuse editors of vandalism – you will be blocked from editing. Politrukki (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for one week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have also been edit warring. Your behavior is not acceptable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After reading your most recent post at User talk:Guettarda, I have extended your block to indefinite, based on No legal threats. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]