User talk:Ironthrone01
January 2014
[edit]Hello, Ironthrone01. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article UP Circuit, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
CKT Page
[edit]Hi! I edited UP Circuit to remove advert tone somehow. I commented the awards and scholars part from the History section as I think this should be written in a different section other than History, say Awards and Recognitions. Also, the History section needs to be edited as it looks too short, you could probably include launch dates of the activities discussed in further sections. As an added suggestion, you can include past presidents and officers, etc. Cheers! I hope the article develops to be more encyclopedia-like! –SJ Defender (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)