User talk:Isaiah Edwards

Welcome!

Hello, DEOrganicChurch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Traditional vs Organic Church, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Vivvt (Talk) 01:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Traditional vs Organic Church

The article Traditional vs Organic Church has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Vivvt (Talk) 01:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Traditional vs Organic Church for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Traditional vs Organic Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional vs Organic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 12:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Isaiah Edwards (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a single user not an organization. I am at this point feeling the hostility of the wiki team through biting the new user. Little help has been offered up to this point on how to make improvements; instead, my first wiki article has been recommended for deletion within minutes of posting. Then, within an hour after that, another editor recommended it for speedy deletion without adding a single helpful hint on how to make the article better. These actions were accomplished late at night in my time zone. To add to the difficulties, I found my username blocked this morning even though I am a single user. Is this the way that Wikipedia welcomes its new contributors that work for free to help expand knowledge to the user community?DEOrganicChurch (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Per my discussion with the blocking admin I am unblocking you on the condition you request a change of username to something with no connection to the subject of your edits that makes clear the account is being used by one person and one person only. I would also commend to your attention the neutral point of view policy, which some of your edits have fallen foul of. Further, I hope that you understand that most of your new-article submissions read more like essays than encyclopedia articles, and try to remedy that in future editing. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]