User talk:Ishan mhiranga

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2.0 (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay

the Indian express said Rajinikanth starrer 2.0 crosses Rs 700 crore mark

2.0 box office collection: Rajinikanth starrer 2.0 continues its winning streak even in the third week. The film has crossed the Rs 700 crore mark worldwide.Trade analyst Ramesh Bala shared the latest box office figures of 2.0. He wrote on Twitter, “#2Point0 3rd Weekend WW BO Totals: #India Gross – ₹ 565 Crs Overseas – ₹ 140 Crs Total – ₹ 705 Crs

and ”www.sacnilk.com said

world wide collection is 723core

So I think what is given in wiki is based on tims of India only. And that's without considering the reliable sources I mentioned above! Ishan mhiranga (talk) 10:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the article said 700, why did you add 750? as seen here. Frankly the difference between 699.89 and 700 is not worth bothering with. As for www.sacnilk.com that is 'not a reliable source and is listed as such at WP:ICTFSOURCES. It is worth looking at that list, to see what is considered reliable, before searching for sources. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay

I agree with that. Sorry for the mistake. 800 Crores in Sinhala Wikipedia, another account in Tamil Wikipedia, somehow I rushed under the impression that having accurate information on Wikipedia is important. I have just started sending political articles to Veerakesari magazine. I am a 16 year old boy. But I think thullim is very important even if there is no big difference. Ishan mhiranga (talk) 15:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]