User talk:IslamForEver4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, IslamForEver4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to the article The Lost Tomb of Jesus does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  X MarX the Spot (talk) 22:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please stop[edit]

What you are doing to The Lost tomb of Jesus is called WP:OR. You may hold whatever belief you want, but WP is not the place to push them. "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" (WP:V). So, you either (1) "make straightforward mathematical calculations or logical deductions based on fully attributed data that neither change the significance of the data nor require additional assumptions beyond what is in the source.", either (2) provide reliable sources. Otherwise your edits become disruptive. Thank you. adriatikus | talk 18:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

October 2008[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Doug Weller (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. You're wrong. The documentary suggests that it's not only someone in that tomb. They say it was Jesus. While it's correct to conclude that the documentary targets Christianity, the side effect is that it simultaneously contradicts Islam. It's right it appears they've found someone named Jesus. But the documentary says the corpse buried in that ossuary was "that" Jesus (Christ in Christianity, Isa in Islam).

Oh, please sign your posts on talk pages. You do it by typing 4 times tilde: ~~~~. adriatikus | talk 21:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Travistalk 21:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]