User talk:Izmisluvas

Vandalism at Krushevo Republic and Ilinden Uprising

Please, do not vandalize these articles. There's no way with vandalism to prove your POV and fringe view points. I have returned the first article to the stable version. 88.203.200.74 (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not make substantial changes into articles as you did on both above, without reaching consensus on their talk pages. Use academic sources, published by neutral western universities to support your opinion. Your edits resemble vandalism. Thank you. 88.203.200.74 (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again, I have tried to talk to you, but you do not seem intent on responding to my call for discussion. Be advised that consensus is one of the main pillars here. Decisions on controversial topics are reached through discussion. There is no way to work together if you refuse to be engaged in a discussions. Constantly reverting, making strange edits, misinterpreting sources, and generally editing just to promote your point of view is kind of vandalism. 88.203.200.74 (talk) 14:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your last edit, because you removed sourced content and added biased one. Do not make it again. Thank you. 212.117.45.70 (talk) 18:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Vodnokon4e (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Ilinden–Preobrazhenie Uprising

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Izmisluvas reported by User:Vodnokon4e (Result: Blocked). EdJohnston (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles of interest to you are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

I'm alerting you because of the AN3 complaint that you were edit warring on a Balkan topic. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]