User talk:JT904

Welcome!

Hello, JT904, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Unique Grlz, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ScottyBerg (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Unique Grlz

A tag has been placed on Unique Grlz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ScottyBerg (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Looney Tunes Show, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Diffs: [1][2][3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding your latest edit here, the deal is this: You may be correct that The Looney Tunes Show has been cancelled, and you may have asked the creators, and you may even know the creators, or work on the show, or you may even BE the creator as far as anybody on Wikipedia knows. But the community requires confirmation from reliable sources, not from discussion forums, rumor mills, or from personal knowledge. If you want the series end date in the article, you need to find a reliable source and not rely on original research ("And before anybody tries, I have proof that The Looney Tunes Show was confirmed to be cancelled by one of the creators of the show.") Wikipedia is not in any hurry, so even if it takes a year to find a reliable source to confirm the end date, the community is okay with that. But continuing to submit that information without proper sources is considered disruptive. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Looney Tunes Show, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [4] Introduction of an unsourced future date. Assuming this was a mistake, it's still unsourced, and you have been warned, with a detailed explanation, not to submit unsourced data again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Looney Tunes Show. Diff: [5] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Hi, articles must be written from a neutral point of view. In this edit, you inserted three more negative reviews about the series. Where is the balance, or any attempt to provide balance? We are not here to promote our own worldviews, so if you have it in your head that the series stinks, and you want to really sell that point, that's not how we do things at Wikipedia, and you will find that many of your edits get reverted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]