Jump to content

User talk:Quijote3000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Jaimevelasco)

Your removal of content of the Burundi article

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Burundi. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Belovedfreak 11:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Dylan, Prince of Asturias Award

[edit]

Hi User:Jaimevelasco, as you know, Bob Dylan article is currently undergoing a Featured Article Review. We've been asked to reduce length of article considerably. Introduction to article previously mentioned that Dylan had been honoured as Commandeur des Arts et des Lettres in France, by Polar Music Prize in Sweden, by Kennedy Center Honors in USA, and by Prince of Asturias Award in Spain. These honours have been dropped, but they are still referred to because article states that "throughout his career, Dylan has won many awards" and this wiki-links to the List of Bob Dylan awards including the Prince of Asturias Award. best wishes Mick gold (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palin wiki editing

[edit]

Hey there, could you write up one or two goods sentences about the matter and relate them to the Public image of Sarah Palin? I think your point belongs there. Best, LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 03:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversions on User talk:Young Trigg

[edit]

I'm a bit confused as to what this was about. Users are allowed to remove whatever they want (usually) from their own talk page. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 12:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I am aware of what happened regarding that user, hence why I had it on my watchlist and saw your change :) The thing is, we do allow all users, even IP vandals, to remove stuff from their talkpage, and the history can be used to check if they've had previous warnings or controversies or something. As the news story blew over a while back and the user is no longer actively editing, it seems a bit pointless to revert something he clearly doesn't want there, especially as it's all still visible in the history :) Tombomp (talk/contribs) 13:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dragon Age: Origins. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 00:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The differences between the console versions and the PC version are detailed above that section. Secondly, it sounded like a personal comment (I'm not sure if I warned you for violating NPOV or putting original research, but I should have done the former). It had no other material added as to why it was the superior version. While I'm sure that may be true, it shouldn't have been in that section, which is dedicated to the differences between the 360 and PS3 versions. Leave it as is, please. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 22:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the PC versions differences are in the article. They're a bit dotted aroun last I saw though. Anyway, don't let me drive you off. If you have any other ways you think you can improve the article, don't hesitate to do so. I'd hate to think I've been a bitey git and driven you away. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 23:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]