User talk:Jaimi090
Your article has been moved to AfC space
[edit]Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Jaimi090/Bruce Muirhead has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Muirhead, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mangoe (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Until there is more content there's no reason not to point this back to Eidos Institute; we wouldn't generally have an article for the founder of something if that were the only thing we could say about them. Mangoe (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Eidos Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Eidos Institute – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MegaSloth (talk) 01:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
[edit]
Hello Jaimi090. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eidos Institute, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. This also applies to Bruce Muirhead; you effectively declare your COI in this edit: "I am writing up a new page for the ceo of the Eidos Institute" --MegaSloth (talk) 10:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Muirhead, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Bruce Muirhead
[edit]
Hello Jaimi090. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Bruce Muirhead.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Muirhead}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)