User talk:Janetta johnson

I am currently going back and fourth with someone one my sons page. This person insist on including information about and alleged marijuana cition that has been expunged and vacated out of the courts . Please block this person from making anymore insertions about this. This case has been vacated and expunged there are no longer any court documents concerning this so any information the editor has is only hearsay. Wikipedia editors do not have our permission to include Any information concerning this matter into his information page.

Thank you so much Janetta Johnson

Well, I disagree. I have added reliable sources, including the facts that this case has been vacated and the record has been expunged. You are welcome to improve the article by adding other information, but you need to add sources. Just reverting my edits is not the appropriate reaction in my opinion. Zamekrizeni (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I can suggest, please read over WP:BIOSELF and specifically the information about having information oversighted. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Janetta johnson reported by User:Zamekrizeni (Result: ). Thank you. Zamekrizeni (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]