Jump to content

User talk:Jasmine.pr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2022

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Jasmine.pr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jasmine.pr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jasmine.pr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Kuru (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not affiliated with nor do I personally know said individual nor am I being paid, I think it’s wrong of you to not acknowledge one’s accomplishment's and on the eve of gay pride month leads me to feel you are prejudice. Said individual is a transgendered female who owns a cosmetics company she’s an accredited actress and film maker , I am inspired by her value that I personally feel she deserves a Wikipedia don’t you ? Jasmine.pr (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also being that I to am transgender and hope to one day be as accomplished, is it wrong to plea the upmost truth about Richardz that you took it upon yourself to delete a completed article, there was nothing but factual information, it was not and I do repeat not in anyway a form of vanity” these are sited fact, I’m sorry if she’s just a little to accomplished to believe!!! But when it comes to biography notability and facts everything was sited and you deleted it. Please don’t edit anything here or delete it. !!! Jasmine.pr (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]