User talk:Jcbarr

Vulgarity

Please refrain from usinf vulgarity (ie: linking to the word "Fuck") on your Wikipedia page. There are children under the age of 18 who use this as a source of valuable information. Thank You. Signed, a Member of the Concerned Citizens of Wikipedia. Seinfeld01 22:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Seinfeld01[reply]

UNC-CH vandal

I'm trying to get the person who does the history, "North Carolina" etc. vandalism blocked. So far they've used these IPs that I'm aware of:

68.221.29.244 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 69.89.128.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 68.221.72.217 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 68.221.39.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

If you want to help do this, please post warnings when they vandalise, try to get admin attention, etc. Thanks! Light in Water 13:33, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest State University

Yes, you are right about there being a detailed explanation of the charter vs operation issue. Also, I did write a statement in the talk page before I changed the official page. I had assumed that universities begin operating right after they are chartered. 65.8.119.93 15:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speaker

Hi. You've been deleting the link from Interjection to speaker. This is a mistake, since "Speaker" is not only a disambiguation page AND there is still no specific article on speaker (linguistics). Please stop or at least give arguments. Velho 17:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... You might be right. Velho 02:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard S. Dennison, Jr.

Done. It definitely needs wotk, and I had it on my to-do, but he's all yours. Alansohn 17:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

grand slam link is fine now

Its pointing to the correct page now.

Pizzadeliveryboy 16:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grand slam

Grand slam is not the name of the rugby union six nations championship. A grand slam is when one team goes through a 6N championship without losing or drawing a single game. I have corrected the relevant pages.GordyB 16:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The six nations page does fully explain what a grand slam is. There has been a need for a Grand slam (rugby union) page for some time but I have never got around to creating it, hence the link points to a disambiguation page. I have corrected the new entry slightly as confusingly there are two entirely different sports called 'rugby'. The term 'Grand slam' is used in rugby union but not in rugby league.GordyB 13:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

65.43.196.54 blocked

You are, of course, correct. Sorry, the mutliple headings and warnings between the test3 and your test4 got in the way. I've blocked for a month, since the previous block was for two weeks. Thanks for the note, D e ath phoenix 20:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and just to let you know, in my opinion, for repeat vandals, you probably don't need to put any sort of warning if they vandalise again: just list them on WP:AIV. --D e ath phoenix 20:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Triangle

I proposed a solution to Dunn question. please review and see if it is agreeable to you.

[1] [2]

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

It has been a few days...I will unprotect to see what happens now. That vandals should be gone. The score change dispute will hopefully not lead to a revert war.Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 23:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bias, Radical Newspapers, and Vandals

I regret what transpired and the allegations made. You were right to call me on certain violations. I wish you well.Firmitas 01:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 209.66.18.235

My mistake; I misread the date of the last warning. Still, the user has stopped; feel free to repost if it happens again. :) Radio Kirk talk to me 14:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Howell

There is no copywrite violation. I wrote most of the imdb entry as well as the wiki entry. This afd is political vandalism. If you look the wiki and imdb are not even the same to cause a copywrite violation. The wiki article has info not in the imdb article. All the info is correct. Signed Gary Howell aka --71Demon 15:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandilise the article again. It now has a protection lock and admins have been notified. --71Demon 16:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin St

Good idea, I hadn't considered adding it to speedy deletions because it wasn't nonsense or anything, just non-notable — but that's pretty much what A7 says, doesn't it? I'm going to add a speedy-delete tag to this; you can re-vote under the new section if you want. Thanks! — Larry V (talk) 18:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article you may be interested in

I thought you might be interested in helping me make the UNC-Duke rivalry entry a better article. Remember 18:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Ragan deletion nomination

Hi, I have received notice from you regarding the page I began about Jesse Ragan. First, I am not the man, nor have I met him. I began the article because as a professor of typography I felt his work significant, and that he had achieved work of lasting merit fairly early in his life. He has been several time recognized by the American Institute of Graphic Arts (AIGA) (the national professional organization for graphic deisgners), his work has appeared in respected design periodicals, he has lectured on typography and his own work at several Association of Independent Colleges of Art and Design (AICAD) institutions.

Several days ago I noticed removal of his name from credits for typefaces on the Tobias Frere-Jones article. My first thought was that some disagrement might have occured between Ragan and his former employers Hoefler & Frere-Jones, perhaps leading to a nomination for deletion. Mr. Hoefler wrote to me publicly on my talk page that Jesse Ragan was only one of many who worked on the project. That may be the case, but would not discredit typefaces Ragan has produced entirely on his own, or the two mentions of his contributions to the Gotham typeface on the AIGA web site. Clearly, at some point someone at Hoefler & Frere-Jones thought Ragan's contributions significant enough to provide his name (and not the rest of that team) to our national professional organization. The fact that Mr. Ragan is now independent and a competitor to other type foundries might be a part of this. But I have no knowledge of this. I know none of these people personally, and I respect the work of all of them as a review of my edit history will suggest. My primary reason for beginning the article is to increase the number of articles on typeface designers, and a secondary desire to increase the number of typography related articles in general. Jesse Ragan's work is very solid, even his own direct client list is impressive. In the world of typography, apprentices are historically given credit, witness Francesco Griffo who apprenticed to Aldus Manutius. It is my hope that Wikipedia will continue to make some room for subjects that though not block buster in scale are significant. CApitol3 20:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James, I am not entirely clear, is it you who believes I wrote jesse Ragan about myself, or someone else? I am not the man, I am graphic deisgner and a teacher at the Art Institute of Boston. While I would love to be able to make type it is quite a diffeent profession from graphic design. Jim CApitol3 21:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip, I suppose it's nothoing very big in the scheme of thngs, I don't really know if this "Jesse" is male or female, but I do suspect that the person who nominated the page for deletion may be a competitor of Ragan's or former client/employer. Back to finding something less controversial to write about. CApitol3 14:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alt-S and Firefox 2.0

I was searching for a fix to the problem you mentioned, and found your complaint first. As it turns out, Firefox 2.0 has moved the default web page functions to ALT-SHIFT instead of ALT, so where alt-s used to save, alt-shift-s saves now. Boojum 03:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project Congress

As a participant of WikiProject U.S. Congress, please consider placing {{Project Congress to do}} at the top of your User_talk page. Thank you. —Markles 15:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Johnson

Would you have any source for the birthyear that you gave for Congressman Charles Johnson? I cannot find any independent source for his birthyear, even after looking through the Edenton Cemetary Records. It would be good for a report I am issuing to the Congressional Biographical Directory. Thanks, Star Garnet (talk) 05:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

translation impossible?

There is a discussion going on whether the name of that German church body can be translated or not (it appears like this on the english pages of this church's homepage). One user changed the name of this Church (actually a federation of several Lutheran, United and Reformed churches) and it's regional member churches to the German form because he says their names can't get translated. so the article on the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bavaria now appears under its German name because he says the "concept" can't be translated into English. Please go to the discusson page of the Evangelical Church in Germany and have your say --02:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.130.249.56 (talk)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Jcbarr! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cate Edwards (3rd nomination) Borock (talk) 09:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US National Archives collaboration

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Southern Season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Southern Season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Southern Season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ukexpat (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jcbarr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jcbarr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Interstate 440 (North Carolina)

Interstate 440 (North Carolina) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]