User talk:JeWay
Blocked
[edit]I have blocked you from editing for 31 hours for vandalism to the Joke chess problem article; an inappropriate {{db}} tag, after I removed a similar one yesterday. When your block is released, please edit constructively, or longer blocks will follow. --barneca (talk) 19:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
JeWay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Look, I didn't vandalize. I thought you removed the db tag because I didn't explain why it should be deleted. So now when I do explain it, you block me. I have done nothing wrong. I make constructive, good edits, not vandalism. So will some kind admin just please unblock me. I'm truly pentinent and will do good. You are truly devoted people..--JeWay (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I see no evidence of an attempt to explain why the article merited deletion, particularly when reviewing your edits here and here. Your only edit to Barneca's talk page is this edit, which does nothing to discuss the issue. Accusing the blocking admin of bias does not indicate why you should be unblocked, either. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JeWay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Oh, that's how I'm suppoused to explain it. I thought explaining it was just catergorizing the reason for the speedy deletion. I'm very sorry I didn't realize this. I would very much appreciate it if you could please unblock me and I'll spend some time doing a little more thinking about the conditions here on Wikipedia. I wouldn't want this one little error keep me from editing here. Thanks.
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason for your block. — Sandstein 22:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JeWay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please. I'm just begging you. Please, remove my block or reduce it. I'm begging you. Just look at my records. I've done nothing wrong. I don't even understand why I was blocked. --JeWay (talk) 01:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per discussion below. Plus, begging is so indignified. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
JeWay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please unblock me. I have done nothing wrong. I wish to continue editing on wikipedia. As soon as I was blocked for the joke chess problem situation, arncea suddenly now used the excscuse I might be a sockpuppet. He's trying to make this into a trial. Please unblock me so i can continue.
Decline reason:
You did "nothing wrong"? How about disrupting Wikipedia by nominating valid pages for deletion? Page protected. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 08:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
More info for reviewing admin
[edit]I have reblocked indefinitely; based on contributions, and the articles on which they're being disruptive, I agree with whoever put the suspected sock tag on their user page; this is clearly returning vandal User:The Great Editor In Chief. --barneca (talk) 19:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I decided not to delete the above message, but please let it be NULL AND VOID This is not trial, Barncea.--JeWay (talk) 19:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Barneca,
[edit]Barncea, you are making this into a trial. You are trying to curve an admin into not allowing my unblock. This is not allowed. You have to allow the admin. to make the decision. I did not remove your beeseeching to demount my place as a companion in Wikpedia, mainly to show how your bias has taken controll. Again,this isn't trial.--JeWay (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 'Barncea, you are making this into a trial. You are trying to curve an admin into not allowing my unblock. This is not allowed. You have to allow the admin. to make the decision. I did not remove your beeseeching to demount my place as a comBarncea, you are making this into a trial. You are trying to curve an admin into not allowing my unblock. This is not allowed. You have to allow the admin. to make the decision. I did not remove your beeseeching to demount my place as a companion in Wikpedia, mainly to show how your bias has taken controll. Again,this isn't trial.--JeWay (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC) panion in Wikpedia, mainly to show how your bias has taken controll. Again,this isn't trial.--JeWay (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)