User talk:Jesseorg

Welcome!

Hello, Jesseorg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beijing Neighborhood

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beijing Neighborhood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bjnei

Hello Jesseorg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bjnei for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Itemirus (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page was deleted more than 5 years ago. If you have new information about the topic / can show that it meets our notability guidelines, you are free to create a new article. —Kusma (t·c) 14:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seneca Mission Indian Church Grounds moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seneca Mission Indian Church Grounds, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to myself, should I be motivated at some point to revisit this article 'stub'.

The page was created because several Wikipedia articles reference this location. Those articles are listed in this article. They contain references to news and other historical documentation, perhaps it is necessary to copy those references into this article.

The article, "Seneca Mission Indian Church Grounds Desecration" contains many details about this location, several sections of which would be more appropriate in a general article under the current name of the site. However there is no such general article describing the site.

The location was a burial site for a famous native American leader who interacted with the US national government, as such its existence is noteworthy. Certainly this article is not sufficient in detail nor in references, however it is not my purpose to write the article, only note that it should exist. It would be unfortunate if the attempt is destined to disappear, but such is the nature of knowledge. Jesseorg (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Seneca Mission Indian Church Grounds

Hello, Jesseorg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seneca Mission Indian Church Grounds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]