I just want to say thanks for your work on supermoon. My heart sank when I saw the article in the Daily Mail soon after the earthquake and I suspected plenty of people would turn to Wikipedia for details, only to be met by some pseudoscientific rubbish. You've done an admirable job of keeping things sane, and I'm grateful for your efforts to contact Nolle and try and get him to clarify his fuzzy explanations. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Before I made my edit, there was a problem with reference #14. I opened it up and looked for the proper format. You probably made a change while I had it open, and then when I saved it (taking out one ">"), it overwrote your change. I think that is what happened. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 00:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Earthquakes and "Supermoons"
Thanks for your research outlined in Talk:Supermoon#Evidence_that_earthquakes_are_no_more_likely_to_occur_around_the_time_of_an_earthquake_than_by_chance. You're right that blog posts are generally not referenceable in Wikipedia articles. Any chance you can get it published somewhere reputable?