User talk:Jethro 82
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Jethro 82, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --GreenJoe 17:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Euthanasia
[edit]Hi. I'd like to avoid going back and forth on the page itself, which already gets alot of vandalism and npov edits. I think if you look through the nation summaries, you'll see that (1) it's hard to generalize, though if you can write-up an overall summary more power to you, and (2) some placed, like Albania and Japan, may legally allow without strict regulation or bureaucracy like NL or Belgium. Of course, the meaning of euthanasia is hotly contested, but one can easily argue that forms of passive euthanasia are legalized in the U.S. (e.g., Cruzan case) and not strongly regulated per se. What do you think? Can we drop that sentence, or what do you feel is essential to say in the intro? HG | Talk 04:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
In a nutshell, it doesn't inform the reader to say "In countries that have legalized Euthanasia it is almost always strongly regulated." Does "strongly regulated" mean (1) well-enforced or (2) subject to a a high level of rules? Sounds like you and I agree that (1) the enforcement varies widely. Nowadays, medicine is subject to increasing legal scrutiny, so we can take for granted (2) that medical/hospital laws involve lots of regulations. (You might check to see which articles discuss the increasing legal oversight of medicine, but it needn't be said in this overview.) In other words, the terms of the preceding sentences ("laws" "legal" "criminalized") adequately imply "regulation." Personally, I'd like to see the overview, besides mentioning the diversity of legal treatment, say something about the diversity: of definitions (meanings of 'euthanasia'), of actions/treatments that might be said to fall within these definitions, of in-depth moral and religious thought, of public opinion. (Ideally, I'd add something about the capacity of 'euthanasia' to instantiate the extremes of compassion and cruelty, but if I came up with artful prose it'd probably be hacked to death, so to speak.) Thanks to you too for being civil! HG | Talk 05:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, hope to encourage you to contribute more to euthanasia, it could use help. Maybe ideas above useful. HG | Talk 14:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to United States presidential election, 2000, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Anastrophe 06:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jethro 82. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jethro 82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, Jethro 82. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)