User talk:Jimgreensboro

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Jimgreensboro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 03:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice regarding prior Scientology arbitration case[edit]

WP:ARBSCI

Please be aware of the arbitration case at the above link. Please read through the remedies, especially with regards to:

as well as other applicable relevant remedies. Thank you for your time. -- Cirt (talk) 19:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean, in short? Jimgreensboro (talk) 01:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jimgreensboro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

209.236.250.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

PhilKnight

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: I've reviewed this request, but it appears that you are User:MrSimmonds, and also all of these accounts. You should only use one account on Wikipedia- if you have fully solved the problem that made your block necessary, you can request unblock on your original account. Note that you appear to have a conflict of interest that makes it difficult to edit subjects related to scientology in a neutral way, and that you've been dishonest in your use of multiple accounts, so you will find it very difficult to persuade anyone to unblock you without a very good plan for editing differently in the future. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you show good faith by taking a week away from Wikipedia for each account you've used. After that time, make a sincere apology on your original account (I think it's User:Shutterbug?), including a complete list of accounts you've used (including any we haven't caught) and an honest promise to completely avoid writing in articles related to Scientology in the future. I can't promise that will be successful, but it's the only thing that has a chance of working. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre! Asking for removal again:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jimgreensboro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not used any other accounts, I am not "Shutterbug" and I have not intentionally violated any wikipedia rules. Somebody vandalized or messed around with my user page. I tried to correct it and was blocked. In my limited understanding of wikipedia I am asking for this block to be removed because something is going wrong. I would like to get this investigated and assure full cooperation. If there is something I should apologize for I will do so, whatever it is. But please tell me what I did wrong. Jimgreensboro (talk) 02:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:CheckUser evidence indicates that this account is operating from the same IP address as User:MrSimmonds, another account with edits to scientology-related articles. The accounts appear to be sockpuppets of one another, or two accounts inappropriately used by the same person. Stick to the MrSimmonds account and request an unblock from that account in one week.--Chaser (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jimgreensboro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you again for your fast response. I can not "Stick to the MrSimmonds account and request an unblock from that account in one week.". It is not my account, I cannot access it and I probably shouldn't be able to as someone else owns it. Can I apply for a repetition of this "checkuser" request? The outcome is false. Jimgreensboro (talk) 23:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are using the same IP addresses (according to the CheckUser that looked into it) and making the same kinds of edits as 3 other accounts; that seems fairly conclusive to me. Jayron32 05:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jimgreensboro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Jayron32, so there is another person using the same internet provider? I am not surprised, they must have more than a million clients. Is there a possibility to repeat this "checkuser" request? Who do I have to talk to? I like my account and I do not want to give it up.

Decline reason:

STEE-RIKE THREE!! YER OWWWWWW-IT!!!!!! Checkuser evidence was conclusive, as well as other evidence at the SPI. Of course your ISP has two million customers ... but they don't all share the same IP address, do they? Since you utterly refused to get the point here, I'm shutting off access to your talk page so you won't further waste our time. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.