User talk:Jjinfoothills

Welcome!

Hello Jjinfoothills, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 13:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rotary International

I notice that the membership section has explanations for how to use a link!? "to read a biography, click on a name. For example : click on Augusto Pinochet to read the bio of an honorary Rotary member" This seems odd and I notice it has been deleted and added back maybe a couple of times. Why is this needed? Jjinfoothills

Good morning. I have restaured two times that vandalism and explained two times.

I am happy that you use now the disc. page as said in "History".

You said "If some people can't see links, how are they supposed to get to Wikipedia in the first place? Instructions removed.)" and I answered you : " Blind people use a max the caracter-reading system, wikipedia is not accessibility-compliant, or older people are not always equipped to see the links".

I notice that you corrected the social actions of Rotary and seem to know well the Rotary social life. Are you Rotarian ? I speak of vandalism because we had a lot of vandalism onto that page, because Rotarian did not like to enumerate some "Famous Rotarian". For example, Pinochet was removed from a so called Central America IP address.

Rotary-certified people tried also to flood "Bad" Rotarians in a full list of other members.

I have a few questions :

Can a disabled person learn by text-mode that she can read any bio ? GW.Bush, Armstrong ?

Is the problem linked to to have some name choosed as an example ?

Can Pinochet be a problem as an example ?

Do you prefer somebody else than Pinochet for an example of Famous Rotarian ?

I do not mind at all to place anyone. Who do you prefer ?

By the way at a time there was a distinction between Famous Active and Famous Honorary,

to show a symetry with the two types of membership. I have restored it.

Best regards,

PierreLarcin2 09:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am totally confused. As of the current time, I have not edited anything on the Rotary page. If you are referring to the comments on the edits, I'm afraid they are not my edits and they are not my comments. I'm just here asking about these odd directions. Personally, I think they're irrelevant. What other Wikipedia articles have such a explanation for how to use a link? I've never seen one, but I've seen many similar lists. My question is, "Why this article? Why Rotary?" Jjinfoothills 03:15, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is the only wiki I developed for the moment on en.wiki and most of European langages. You're right there is some list problem about the long list and also for the readibility or accessibility. I can't help on that, because this list is the result of a flooding technique for wikipedia fiddling, done after the work I did to add facts onto Rotary.

The real problem is that is a closed club, like freemasonry, and...not really transparent.

The only way to add info is either to think on facts, either to accept info from Rotarians.

I plan to change the presentation to make the list more readable for a non-blind. I do not want to cut anything, as it could be some censorship. By the way, I cure for blinds also, which could be upset by the length of the list. That"s already the case for non blinds, and the purpose of the flooding. This flooding, I repeat was done by people close to Rotary (User CeeGee for example). About the way to explore accessibility, I can't help more than that for the moment, I suppose wiki will evolve to comply to nex accessibility standards. PierreLarcin2 12:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non commercial

Image:94583308 d0d872bc01 o.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:94583308 d0d872bc01 o.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Vinhtantran (talk) 14:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was uploaded nearly two years ago and at the time I think "non-commercial use only images" were frowned upon, but not deleted (?). A partner image (same source) was also uploaded but got tagged without the "non-commercial use only", however upon looking at the source it also has the "non-commercial use only" tag. I have therefore listed that image for speedy deletion as well. At some future point I will search out replacement images for the article when I have time, or head down there and take them myself. Jjinfoothills (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]