User talk:Joetkeck

unblock, how simply...

Welcome!

Hello Joetkeck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Solar

Joetkeck 17:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good day to those of you following my attempted contributions to a better Wikipedia,

I believe that I have been blocked unfairly, but, being new to Wikipedia am struggling to learn how to overcome being censored.

Thank you, Joe

You were warned, yet persisted so no unblock at the moment (it expires in about 1.5 hours anyway). Your comments below also don't seem to suggest you understand that edit warring/revert warring is unacceptable. If you believe passionately about your view point you need to put it across in a constructive way, and accept that sometime s your way will not be accepted. --pgk^(talk) 18:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --rehpotsirhc ^{█♣█ ▪ Talk} 02:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

````Peace on Earth is acceptable by each of you.

Joetkeck 23:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Good day. I am new to Wikipedia rules, so I am not sure if this is the proper format to respond. Please note that I have not undone anybody's edits. In fact mine have been undone repeatedly. I will continue this discussion in the Truth Movement' section of the discussion page. Thank you, Joe[reply]

Please read the page on the three-revert rule that I linked to above. At this point you are in gross violation. Please undo your last edit and you may avoid being blocked from editing. Trying to force in your changes is not productive. Take it to the talk page and try to build consensus there. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 25 hours by SushiGeek for 3rr. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Joetkeck 01:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Good day. Why is it me rather than others that are violating the rule? The rule that has been pointed out to me regards reverting to previous web pages. My 'edits' are additions and not 'undoings." Thank you. Joe[reply]

Your remarks suggest that you may not have given the policy(three-revert rule your full attention when you read it. You can ask for your block to be reviewed by putting {{unblock}} on this page. Tom Harrison ^Talk 01:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joetkeck 19:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Good day. It seems to be you, Tom Harrison, that is preventing me most recently from contributing verifiable knowledge to Wikipedia. To do so is an abuse of your authority. i hope you are held accountable for your actions. Joe[reply]

Please don't try to evade the block. I've reset it to end 24 hours from now. After your block is up, use the talk page to try to build consensus for the changes you want to make. To request a review of my block, put {{unblock}} on this page. Include the curly brackets. Tom Harrison ^Talk 19:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joetkeck 20:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Are you on-line? Why are you stripping fair reference to the 9/11 Truth Movement? joe[reply]

What is your question? Tom Harrison ^Talk 20:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joetkeck 20:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Two questions there. Assuming you are still on-line, are you the one preventing me from contributing to the main Wikipedia 9/11 page to allow reference to the 9/11 Truth Movement + ? joe[reply]

Joetkeck 20:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked the IP address you were using to avoid your block under the three-revert rule, and I reset your 24 hour block. I also undid some of your edits on the 9/11 page, where you have been persistently trying against consensus to link in "9/11 truth movement." Tom Harrison ^Talk 20:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joetkeck 20:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Consensus is not always the basis of objectivity. To refer people to the 9/11 Truth Movement should be allowable whether one or one hundred people agree. Joe[reply]

Well, Wikipedia operates largely through consensus. After your block is up, visit the talk page and try to convince people that the link is appropriate. If you read the archives first (something you can do while blocked), you'll get an idea of what arguments have already been offered. I got your emails; this is my reply to them as well. Tom Harrison ^Talk 20:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joetkeck 23:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Have you changed your mind? Should not objectivity be the fundamental precept of Wikipedia? To refer people to the 9/11 Truth Movement is a choice that you can or cannot block. Joe[reply]

3RR - May 17

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule.

-Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 15:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Mother for Peace

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Another Mother for Peace, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.swarthmore.edu/library/peace/DG100-150/DG102AMP.html. As a copyright violation, Another Mother for Peace appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Another Mother for Peace has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Another Mother for Peace. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Another Mother for Peace, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Metros232 12:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]