User talk:John7899887

Welcome!

Hello, John7899887, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Boson (talk) 23:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Helmut Kohl

I noticed that you edited the article Helmut Kohl without providing an edit summary. It looks as if at least some of your text was copied from other sources without attribution, which might present a copyright or plagiarism problem. I reverted your edit to be on the safe side. Could you check your edit to see if it complies with Wikipedia copyright policy and - if the source permits copying to Wikipedia - if attribution is required? Thanks!--Boson (talk) 23:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John7899887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly,i am unclear as to the final reason for the blocking of this account.However i have since joining this site attempted to productively contribute to projects which are of interest to me.I have never vandalised any pages nor has this ever been a charge made to me in the past.In fact it was while preparing to provide additional information to the article i created that i noticed that i was unable to edit the website. My contributions to the articles on Constantin Fehrenbach and Helene Wessel were informative and relevant:they drew attention to the articles and helped to smooth their original roughness,it also worth remembering that these were overlooked and even relatively obscure pages which i helped expand. This account has never been used to violate the websites policy, so please understand my frustration at not being able to positively contribute when my intentions and efforts although admittedly sometimes lax ( this is more of a occasional project) were never to harm the site or defame anyone. I felt that sometimes there were gaps in the content of some articles which i could fill both for my own sake and for anyone who regularly frequents Wikipedia as a source of information. My mission has been to expand upon the website and have a record of trying to do so. From the classification of the ban i assume something suspicious has been going on under this IP address or one of the web-hosts i have sometimes regrettably used.Although this still makes no sense to me as even if i am connected to something else , wouldn't given the nature of this account a assumption of innocence be more rational ? I haven't been invested in the wider project and user base as i unfortunately do not have the time which it calls for, but rest assured this account is no bot or sleeper cell either.

I hope for this problem to be resolved so that i can productively contribute to Wikipedia as i intended to before making this discovery. John7899887 (talk) 10:43 pm, 26 October 2016, last Wednesday (6 days ago) (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

As this is a WP:Checkuser block, I am not allowed to unblock without Checkuser permission. As described below, you are free to make new unblock request via WP:UTRS. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@DoRD: What's going on here? Can you take a look. I have no information to start from. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- This account is a Confirmed match to MakeWikipediaGreatAgain (talk · contribs). —DoRD (talk) 13:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @DoRD: I see no behavioral connection. Is it possible that this user is collateral? Vanjagenije (talk) 17:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - The CU evidence looks conclusive, but they're welcome to appeal to UTRS to get another CU's opinion. —DoRD (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]